Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 03 May 2024

Comparative Analysis of the Postcranial Skeleton of the South American Viperids (serpentes, Viperidae) Bothrops and Crotalus Using Two-Dimensional Geometric Morphometrics

,
,
, and
DOI: 10.1670/22-046
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

The Viperidae is the most speciose family of Brazilian venomous snakes, with 33 known species. Although the family is well defined cladistically, there are few studies concerning the postcranial skeletal morphology, and only a single vertebral synapomorphy has been proposed. The paucity of knowledge on postcranial morphology poses challenges for the study of the Brazilian viper fossil record since most fossils consist of disarticulated and isolated vertebrae. Currently, Bothrops and Crotalus are the only vipers recognized in the Brazilian fossil record. Nonetheless, interspecific differentiation based on vertebral material is hampered due to the lack of comprehensive detailed anatomical data. We compared the trunk vertebrae of extant specimens of Crotalus and Bothrops using two-dimensional geometric morphometrics to obtain discriminant data about their vertebral morphology. We examined the trunk vertebrae of 20 vipers, 10 Crotalus, and 10 Bothrops and performed macroscopic analyses and measurements and landmark-based, two-dimensional geometric morphometric analyses. We sought to identify structural differences between the genera and to assess morphological variation along the spine. Most differences in the trunk vertebrae between Crotalus and Bothrops occurred in the length of the neural spine, the parapophyseal processes, the prezygapophyseal processes, and in the angle on the prezygapophyses. However, when we accounted for intracolumnar variation, differentiation is hampered. We expect our results will serve as a starting point for future studies of viperid vertebrae and aid paleontologists in accurately identifying fossil vipers.

Copyright: Copyright 2024 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles 2024
Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Longitudinal variation of the trunk vertebral column in Crotalus durissus (CHRP2076) in lateral view.


Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Isolated mid-trunk Crotalus durissus vertebrae showing the terminology adopted in (A) anterior, (B) posterior, (C) dorsal, and (D) lateral views.


Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Landmarks used in (A) anterior and (B) lateral views are shown in two mid-trunk vertebrae of Crotalus durissus.


Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Crotalus durissus trunk vertebrae for each region in anterior (A, F, K), lateral (B, G, L), dorsal (C, H, M), posterior (D, I, N), and ventral (E, J, O) views. The first row (A-E) are anterior trunk vertebrae, the second row (F-J) are mid-trunk vertebrae, and the third row (K-O) are posterior trunk vertebrae.


Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Bothrops trunk vertebrae for each region in anterior (A, F, K), lateral (B, G, L), dorsal (C, H, M), posterior (D, I, N), and ventral (E, J, O) views. The first row (A-E) are anterior trunk vertebrae, the second row (F-J) are mid-trunk vertebrae, and the third row (K-O) are posterior trunk vertebrae.


Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Zygosphene morphologies are present in Crotalus durissus, being (A) crenate; (B) straight; (C) concave.


Figure 7.
Figure 7.

Principal Component Analysis charts of the Procrustes residues in anterior view (A) and lateral view (B).


Figure 8.
Figure 8.

Canonical Variate Analysis chart for anterior view (A) and lateral view (B).


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author. E-mail: silvialomba06@gmail.com
Accepted: 05 Nov 2023
  • Download PDF