Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 16 Dec 2020

Influence of Prey Scent on Chemosensory Behavior of Two Fossorial Earthsnakes: Conopsis biserialis and Conopsis nasus (Serpentes: Colubridae)

,
, and
Page Range: 460 – 464
DOI: 10.1670/19-051
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

Terrestrial, arboreal, and semiaquatic snake species are well known to discriminate among prey types using chemosensation. In contrast, chemosensory capacities of cryptic and fossorial snake species are not well understood. We tested for interspecific differences in the ability of two fossorial earthsnakes, Conopsis biserialis and Conopsis nasus, to detect and discriminate among potential invertebrate and vertebrate prey based on chemical cues alone. Presentation of swabs treated with various prey odor extracts revealed that both snake species were able to detect prey using chemoreception. Chemosensory tongue-flick attack scores and lower latency responses were significantly different for treated swabs when compared to water controls, and interspecific differences were observed. We also found that tongue-flick attack score was higher for invertebrate prey odors than vertebrate prey odors in both earthsnake species. Additionally, differential chemosensory responses to chemicals from different prey types indicated that snakes could discriminate among at least some invertebrate prey types based on chemosensory cues.

Resumen

Esta bien documentado que las especies de serpientes terrestres, arbóreas y semiacuáticas utilizan la quimiosensación para discriminar entre tipos de presa. En contraste, las capacidades quimiosensoriales de las especies de serpientes crípticas y fosoriales no estan completamente documentados. Evaluamos las diferencias interespecíficas en la capacidad de dos serpientes terrestres fosoriales Conopsis biserialis y C. nasus para detectar y discriminar entre posibles presas de invertebrados y vertebrados basándose únicamente en señales químicas. La presentación de los hisopos tratados con varios extractos de olor de la presa reveló que ambas especies de serpientes pudieron detectar presas usando quimiorrecepción. Los puntajes del lengüeteo quimiosensorial de ataque y los períodos de latencia más bajos fueron significativamente diferentes para los hisopos tratados en comparación con los controles de agua y se observaron diferencias interespecíficas. También se encontró que el puntaje de lengüeteo y ataque fue mayor para los olores de presas invertebradas que para los olores de presas de vertebrados en ambas serpientes terrestres. Además, diferentes respuestas quimiosensoriales a químicos de diferentes tipos de presa indicó que las serpientes podrían discriminar entre al menos algunos tipos de presas de invertebrados en base a las señales quimiosensoriales.

Copyright: Copyright 2020 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles 2020
Fig. 1. 
Fig. 1. 

Tongue-flick attack score (mean ± SE) by two Conopsis species in response to chemical stimuli of vertebrate and invertebrate prey and water control. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between responses for each species; similar letters indicate no significant differences.


Fig. 2. 
Fig. 2. 

Latency time (mean ± SE) by two Conopsis species in response to chemical stimuli of vertebrate and invertebrate prey and water control. Different letters above bars indicate significant differences between responses for each species; similar letters indicate no significant differences.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding Author. E-mail: tuataraya@hotmail.com
Accepted: 04 Oct 2020
  • Download PDF