Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 20 Jul 2018

Factors that Influence the Timing of Calling and Oviposition of a Lotic Frog in Northwestern California

,
,
, and
Page Range: 289 – 298
DOI: 10.1670/17-103
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Species that breed in stream environments with unpredictable interannual variability in hydrological regimes may exhibit plasticity in the timing of their breeding activities. Breeding phenology should coincide with conditions and habitats that maximize a species' reproductive success. For the lotic-breeding frog Rana boylii, the timing of breeding activities of a population can vary by more than a month among years. To examine the influence of abiotic factors on the variation in the timing of onset and patterns (i.e., peaks and pauses) in breeding activity of R. boylii, we sampled seven geographically separated sites that covered an extensive portion of the species' range in northwestern California for two breeding seasons. We collected daily environmental and male vocalization data and conducted weekly egg mass surveys at breeding sites. Here, we found the timing of calling activity and oviposition varied markedly among geographically separated sites and between years. Water depth and water temperature influenced calling phenology, whereas water depth and both temperatures (water and air) were significant factors in the timing of oviposition. In general, breeding activity did not commence until water temperatures reached 10°C. Calling and oviposition occurred later at deeper sites with colder, spring water temperatures. Models that predict the timing of breeding activities can improve survey and monitoring efforts and can assist managers of regulated streams in developing flow assessments that are compatible with species' breeding requirements. This information may be particularly useful in developing individual based models to assess overall reproductive success.

Copyright: Copyright 2018 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles 2018
<sc>Fig</sc>
. 1
Fig . 1

Locations of streams sampled for Rana boylii calling and oviposition activities in northwestern California.


<sc>Fig</sc>
. 2
Fig . 2

Relationship between Rana boylii calling onset dates and oviposition onset dates for populations sampled in northwestern California. The x- and y-axes are labeled with calendar date to simplify interpretation, but the regression equation shown is based on the Julian day of onset. The dashed line shows the 1 to 1 correspondence date for oviposition and calling initiation.


<sc>Fig</sc>
. 3
Fig . 3

Relationship between the A) initiation day of calling and scaled water depth (left) and water temperature (right); and B) initiation day of egg mass detection and scaled water depth (left) and water temperature (right). Water temperature and water depth represent the mean value from 23 April to 23 May. Colors indicate individual sites and shapes indicate survey year (1994, circle; 1995, triangle).


<sc>Fig</sc>
. 4
Fig . 4

Relationship between the a) predicted number of calls and scaled water depth (left) and water temperature (right); and b) predicted number of egg masses and scaled water temperature (left) and water depth (right). Predictions based on top GLMMs.


<sc>Appendix 1.</sc>
Appendix 1.

Daily number of calls (per recording interval), weekly number of egg masses, water depth, air temperature, and water temperature at breeding sites in 1994 and 1995 in northwestern California, USA. Note: The water depth y-axis scale for MSTR 1995 and SFTR 1995 is not the same as other sites and years, and the date x-axis scale for PW 1995 is not the same as other sites and years.


<sc>Appendix 1.</sc>
Appendix 1.

Continued.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding Author. Present address: USDA Forest Service, National Technology and Development Program, Missoula, Montana USA 59808; E-mail: cawheeler@fs.fed.us
Accepted: 26 May 2018
  • Download PDF