Importance of Riparian Forest Buffers in Conservation of Stream Biodiversity: Responses to Land Uses by Stream-Associated Salamanders across Two Southeastern Temperate Ecoregions
Stream microhabitats are strongly influenced by adjacent terrestrial land use and other anthropogenic disturbances. Therefore, sensitive stream fauna can be highly imperiled. We investigated relative susceptibility of stream-associated salamanders to riparian land use by studying species-specific responses that influence community assembly. The Piedmont and Blue Ridge ecoregions of the southeastern United States have high aquatic biodiversity, centuries of land use, and increasingly extensive urbanization. We surveyed low-order streams in these regions for salamanders across four riparian land uses (forests, agricultural, residential, and urban) and assessed 15 habitat variables at each sampling site. We found that forested streams were more diverse compared to streams affected by riparian land uses. Our study showed two distinct assemblages of salamanders in response to riparian land use: forest-dependent, large-bodied, long-lived species sensitive to riparian land uses (disturbance avoiders) and cosmopolitan, small-bodied, short-lived species that are relatively resistant to impacts of riparian land uses (disturbance tolerants). These assemblages varied in composition between the ecoregions, with Blue Ridge harboring more land-use–intolerant species. Results indicated that multiple habitat features of the riparian zone (canopy cover, canopy height, leaf litter cover), and stream geomorphology (bank complexity, streambed heterogeneity, sedimentation) are dramatically altered by riparian land uses, and influence the assemblage structure of salamanders. Riparian buffers in both ecoregions are largely unprotected (70% in Blue Ridge, 96% in Piedmont) and are possibly threatened with anthropocentric land uses. Results suggested that conservation of stream salamander communities should be strengthened with protection and restoration of riparian forests, connectivity among riparian forests, and soil-conservation practices.Abstract

Study site: Blue Ridge and Piedmont ecoregions in the conterminous United States and the southeastern United States.

Species accumulation curves for salamanders: (a) adults of the Blue Ridge streams, (b) larvae of the Blue Ridge streams, (b) adults of the Piedmont streams, (d) larvae of the Piedmont streams.

Diagrammatic representation on salamander segregation (based on species richness, diversity, and evenness) across the riparian land-use and land-cover gradient in Blue Ridge and Piedmont ecoregions.

NMDS ordinations of salamander assemblages at Blue Ridge and Piedmont Ecoregions. The closer the Euclidean distance between the species scores and the site scores in the ordination space, the stronger the ecological association among species recorded and the sites surveyed. (a) Adults of Blue Ridge ecoregion, (b) larvae of Blue Ridge ecoregion, (c) adults of Piedmont ecoregion, (d) adults of Piedmont ecoregion. Thick circles: disturbance avoiders. Monte Carlo simulations with 1,000 iterations revealed that our NMDS ordination plots are substantially different from random ordinations. Thin circles: disturbance tolerators. Species legend: adults—Ecirr: E. cirrigera, Eglut: E. guttolineata, Ewildr: E. wilderae, Dfus: D. fuscus, Dmont: D. monticola, Dmarm: D. marmoratus, Doco: D. ocoee, Dquad: D. quadramaculatus, Purub: P. ruber, Pmon: P. montanus, Gprop: G. porphyriticus. Larvae—Dmon_L: D. monticola, Dmam_L: D. marmoratus, Dquad_L: D. quadramaculatus, Dfus_L: D. fuscus, Eur_L: Eucrycea, Psed_L: Pseudotriton, Gyro_L: G. porphyriticus.
Contributor Notes