Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Dec 2014

Demographic and Reproductive Traits of Western Chicken Turtles, Deirochelys reticularia miaria, in Central Arkansas

and
Page Range: 439 – 444
DOI: 10.1670/12-227
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

The Chicken Turtle, Deirochelys reticularia, is an understudied species despite the fact that it is distributed across much of the southeastern United States. In addition, no previous study has been conducted on the western subspecies, D. r. miaria, even though it is considered rare and possibly in decline within portions of its range. A capture–recapture study was conducted over 3 yr on a population of D. r. miaria in central Arkansas to determine demographic and reproductive characteristics. The population approached a male bias (1.9:1) and consisted of few total individuals (N = 42). Reproductive traits, including clutch, egg, and hatchling size, appear to be similar between D. r. miaria and eastern populations. Annual survival estimates were similar among males, females, and juveniles (0.70, 0.70, and 0.69, respectively) and did not change over the course of the study. Although low compared with most turtles, similar results have been reported for other populations of D. reticularia, which suggests that the species may have a different life-history strategy than that of most other chelonians. Due to this difference, management practices are likely to affect D. r. miaria differently from other turtle species.

Copyright: 2014
Fig. 1. 
Fig. 1. 

Size distribution of Deirochelys reticularia miaria captured at the study pond. Males are designated by white bars, females by black bars, and juveniles by gray bars.


Fig. 2. 
Fig. 2. 

Von Bertalanffy growth curves for male (solid line) and female (dashed line) Deirochelys reticularia miaria based on straight-line carapace length. Equations are included below the curve for males and above the curve for females. Lt is the estimated carapace length at age t. Size and age of males (boxes, n = 10) and females (circles, n = 2) for individuals for which age could be reliably determined are compared with their respective estimated growth curves.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding Author. Present address: Department of Biology, Framingham State University, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA; E-mail: sdinkelacker@framingham.edu

Present address: College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA

Accepted: 08 Nov 2013
  • Download PDF