Editorial Type:
Article Category: Other
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Jun 2014

Foraging by the Omnivorous Lizard Podarcis lilfordi: Effects of Nectivory in an Ancestrally Insectivorous Active Forager

,
, and
Page Range: 203 – 209
DOI: 10.1670/11-321
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Foraging modes were described originally for insectivorous lizards, but many species are omnivorous or herbivorous. Because seeking and consuming plants might alter foraging, we studied foraging by the omnivorous Podarcis lilfordi at two sites: one where lizards licked nectar from flowers of Euphorbia paralias and the other where they sought insects. Movements per minute (MPM) did not differ among groups. Proportion of time spent moving (PTM) was similar in lizards that licked flowers and those that did not. Average speed (AS) was slower, and speed while moving (MS) was faster when foraging for nectar than for insects. Lizards foraging for nectar did not eat insects; those foraging for insects frequently ate them. For lizards foraging for prey, MPM increased as PTM, AS, and capture attempts increased and as PTM decreased. PTM increased as AS and capture attempts increased and decreased as MS increased. AS increased as MS increased. For lizards that licked, proportion of time licking (PTL) was unrelated to MPM, PTM, or AS but increased marginally as MS increased. Lizards foraging for nectar retained the PTM of lizards foraging for prey, but added a large PTL. The ancestral active foraging mode has been retained for hunting insects but modified to search for and lick nectar. While foraging for nectar, lizards greatly reduce attacks on insects, suggesting that, at a given time, an individual forages exclusively for nectar or prey. Reduced predation pressure on islands may have freed lizards to expand the diet by reducing risk during intervals exposed to view while climbing plants and licking nectar.

Copyright: 2014
<sc>Fig</sc>
. 1.
Fig . 1.

Relationships in the other zone where Podarcis lilfordi foraged for insects between number of movements per minute (MPM) and A) proportion of time spent moving (PTM), B) average speed (AS in m/min), and C) speed while moving (MS in m/min).


<sc>Fig</sc>
. 2.
Fig . 2.

Relationships in the other zone where Podarcis lilfordi foraged for insects between proportion of time spent moving (PTM) and A) average speed (AS in m/min) and B) speed while moving (MS in m/min).


<sc>Fig</sc>
. 3.
Fig . 3.

Relationships in the other zone where Podarcis lilfordi foraged for insects between proportion of time spent moving (PTM) and number of feeding attempts (including captures) initiated while moving.


<sc>Fig</sc>
. 4.
Fig . 4.

Relationships for all Podarcis lilfordi between average speed (AS in m/min) and speed while moving (MS in m/min).


<sc>Fig</sc>
. 5.
Fig . 5.

Relationships in the other zone where adult Podarcis lilfordi foraged for insects between total number of feeding attempts (including captures) and A) number of movements per minute (MPM) and B) proportion of time spent moving (PTM).


Contributor Notes

Corresponding Author. E-mail: cooperw@ipfw.edu
Accepted: 23 Jan 2013
  • Download PDF